In “A Deadline For
Grandfathered Weapons”, in the April 15, 2014 New York Times, the New
York Times Editorial Board argues that:
“Experts, like those in law enforcement who
understand firearms, tell us that each of the features on an assault weapon
serves a specific military combat function. Civilian assault weapons retain
specific design features that make them so deadly. Those features are not
cosmetic but are what distinguish assault weapons from traditional sporting
rifles.”
Maxim Lott,
Producer of “John Stossel” on the Fox News Channel, objects to this in his
February 16, 2014 “FoxNews.com”
article “Cosmetic Tweaks To AR-15
Thwart New York’s “Ban” On Assault Rifles” [4], as do The Guardian’s U.S. Reporter and
video Editor Adam Gabbatt and video Journalist Mae Ryan in their Tuesday April
1, 2014 article “New York Assault
Weapons Ban Circumvented With Simple Modification” [3].
“The Safe Act was billed as the nation’s toughest, but a
surprisingly easy loophole makes the weapons legal to sell.” Write Gabbatt and
Ryan. “But while pro-gun campaigners continue to argue that the law is too
strict—and are due to protest outside New York’s statehouse in Albany on
Tuesday—gunmakers, gun shops and gun owners have found a remarkably simple way
to make their assault weapons legal.” [3]. “Simple design tweaks are allowing
gun makers to get around restrictions New York put in place following the 2012 school
shootings in Connecticut, prompting some critics to say the laws were merely
window-dressing.” Lott writes. He explains that the law introduced a stricter
definition of an assault weapon as any semi-automatic rifle that accepts a
detachable magazine and has any one of a list of ten features, such as a “protruding
pistol-like grip”, a “flash suppressor”, a “bayonet mount”, and a “grenade
launcher”. “To avoid that, some owners of old AR-15’s are modifying them so
that they no longer classify as “assault weapons.” Lott writes. “One company, S
and B Products, offers a “spur” to replace the pistol grip.” [4]. “But many gun
shops in New York are offering to replace the grip on a banned weapon to make
it compliant with the law.” Add Gabbatt and Ryan. “These modified weapons do
not have to be registered with the state. Just Right Carbines a gun
manufacturer in Rochester, has gone one step further. It builds modified
semi-automatic rifles specifically for the New York market—and specifically to
comply with the New York gun law.” [3]. “The gun is being marketed by Stag Arms
as a “New York Compliant AR-15”, and features a slightly modified stock and no
bells and whistles.” Lott adds. “The gun does not have a pistol grip, for
instance—one of the features banned by the act.” [4]. “The modified gun still
fires at the same rate and with the same power;” Gabbatt and Ryan write; “The
shooter just holds it slightly differently.” [3].
Lott quotes
American Political Action Committee President and American Conservative Union
Board Member Alan Gottlieb as stating that: “This just shows that the gun
prohibition lobby uses symbolic gestures over substance to push their anti-gun
rights agenda. Banning guns based on cosmetic features proves that point.” Lott
also said that S and B Products President Steve Byron thought that: “the
triviality of the modifications shows that the law is not productive.” [4].
In his
Wednesday April 9, 2014 New York Daily
News article “Black Rain
Production Demonstrates the Governor Cuomo’s Gun Regulations Are Modest And
Reasonable” [6], State University of New York College at Cortland
Political Science Department Chairman and Distinguished Service Professor of
Political Science and Cornell University Visiting Professor Robert Spitzer
takes a different angle from Lott [4] and The
Guardian [3].
“The production of Black Rain, in fact, proves that the Safe
Act is not only no actual threat to gun rights, but is a perfectly reasonable
law.” Spitzer writes. “And putting it together made clear that Cuomo’s goal is
reasonable: to make prolific firing more difficult by having a permanently
attached magazine, and limiting the number of bullets it can hold without reloading.”
“In fact;” He writes; “The only surprise about the manufacture of a New
York-compliant assault rifle is that it didn’t come sooner.” [6].
In her
April 15, 2014 Letter to the Editor of the New
York Times, “Ban On Assault
Weapons”, Leah Barett, Assistant Dean of Columbia University in the
City of New York and Adjunct Lecturer at the Columbia University School of
International And Public Affairs, argues that:
“Law-abiding gun owners should comply with a
law that was passed by a bipartisan legislature is supported by a broad
majority of New Yorkers and has been in effect for fifteen months.” [1].
In his
Monday April 21, 2014 article “New
Yorkers Protest Assault Weapon Registration Law”, The New American Magazine [2] contributing editor Warren
Mass objects to the premise of Barett’s argument, that “law-abiding gun owners
should comply” with New York’s ban on assault weapons [1]. Mass quotes
Springville, New York “range safety officer” Timothy Sedenhjelm, 59, of East
Concord, New York as stating that: “Nobody is going to comply with this.” He
quotes Erie County, New York Sheriff Timothy Howard as saying that he would not
force his deputies to comply, and to enforce registration under the new law: “I
am not encouraging them to do it.” [5].
Associated Press freelance
newsperson Michael Virtanen takes a somewhat less hypothetical approach to this
same objection in Syracuse
Post-Standard Regional Editor David Figura’s April 7, 2014 article “Will New York’s April 15 Deadline To
Register Assault Weapons Be Disregarded?”
Figura and
Virtanen write that: “Many New York gun owners expect the April 15 deadline to
register assault weapons under the state’s strict new law to be largely
ignored.” [2] This agrees with Mass when he writes on April 21 that: “As of
April 5, only 3,000 to 5,000 New Yorker had registered their guns, and
defenders of the Second Amendment estimate that compliance will be less than 10
percent.” [5]. Figura and Virtanen quote Buffalo, New York graphic artist Tutuska
of West Seneca, New York as saying that he wouldn’t register the AR-15’s he’s
owned legally for years: “I refuse to comply.” [2].
1,182 Words
- Barrett, Leah. “Ban On Assault Weapons”. The New York Times. April 20, 2014. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/21/opinion/ban-on-assault-weapons.html?_r=0
- Figura, David. “Will New York’s April 15 Deadline To Register Assault Weapons Be Disregarded?” The Associated Press. April 7, 2014. http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2014/04/new_york_state_gun_owners_expect_few_to_register_law.html
- Gabbatt, Adam and Ryan, Mae. “New York Assault Weapons Ban Circumvented With Simple Modification”. The Guardian. Tuesday April 1, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/01/new-york-assault-weapons-ban-circumvented-modification
- Lott, Maxim. “Cosmetic Tweaks To AR-15 Thwart New York’s Ban On Assault Rifles”. Fox News. February 16, 2014. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/02/16/cosmetic-tweaks-to-ar-15-thwart-new-york-ban-on-assault-rifles/
- Mass, Warren. “New Yorkers Protest Assault Weapon Registration Law”. The New American. Monday April 21, 2014. http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/18096-new-yorkers-protest-assault-weapon-registration-law
- Spitzer, Robert. “An Assault Weapon Gambit Backfires: Black Rain Rifle Production Demonstrates The Governor Cuomo’s Gun Regulation Are Modest And Reasonable”. The New York Daily News. Wednesday April 9, 2014. http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/assault-weapon-gambit-backfires-article-1.1749862